| SCORING OFFENSE |
G |
TD |
FG |
XPT |
2XP |
DXP |
Saf |
Points |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
82 |
24 |
77 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
645 |
46.1 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
51 |
11 |
49 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
392 |
39.2 |
| 3. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
55 |
12 |
52 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
420 |
35.0 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
42 |
12 |
38 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
328 |
32.8 |
| 5. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
45 |
3 |
36 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
321 |
32.1 |
| 6. |
Angelo State |
11 |
46 |
5 |
36 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
329 |
29.9 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
28 |
8 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
220 |
22.0 |
| SCORING DEFENSE |
G |
TD |
FG |
XPT |
2XP |
DXP |
Saf |
Points |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
32 |
7 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
239 |
23.9 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
48 |
7 |
40 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
355 |
25.4 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
36 |
7 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
268 |
26.8 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
39 |
7 |
30 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
289 |
28.9 |
| 5. |
Angelo State |
11 |
46 |
8 |
37 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
341 |
31.0 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
51 |
12 |
43 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
387 |
32.2 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
53 |
7 |
49 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
390 |
39.0 |
| TOTAL OFFENSE |
G |
Rush |
Pass |
Plays |
Yards |
Avg/P |
TD |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
1468 |
5544 |
1066 |
7012 |
6.6 |
77 |
500.9 |
| 2. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
1547 |
3166 |
811 |
4713 |
5.8 |
41 |
471.3 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
2781 |
2256 |
854 |
5037 |
5.9 |
41 |
457.9 |
| 4. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
2619 |
1540 |
694 |
4159 |
6.0 |
49 |
415.9 |
| 5. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
2483 |
1599 |
776 |
4082 |
5.3 |
41 |
408.2 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
867 |
3634 |
851 |
4501 |
5.3 |
45 |
375.1 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
1480 |
1790 |
744 |
3270 |
4.4 |
25 |
327.0 |
| TOTAL DEFENSE |
G |
Rush |
Pass |
Plays |
Yards |
Avg/P |
TD |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
1532 |
1885 |
706 |
3417 |
4.8 |
31 |
341.7 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
1411 |
2229 |
700 |
3640 |
5.2 |
35 |
364.0 |
| 3. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
1664 |
2215 |
737 |
3879 |
5.3 |
45 |
387.9 |
| 4. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
2221 |
3259 |
1041 |
5480 |
5.3 |
47 |
391.4 |
| 5. |
Angelo State |
11 |
1504 |
2891 |
815 |
4395 |
5.4 |
41 |
399.5 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
1834 |
3063 |
1004 |
4897 |
4.9 |
49 |
408.1 |
| 7. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
1506 |
2913 |
779 |
4419 |
5.7 |
37 |
441.9 |
| RUSHING OFFENSE |
G |
Att |
Yards |
Avg. |
TD |
Yards/G |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
496 |
2619 |
5.3 |
36 |
261.9 |
| 2. |
Angelo State |
11 |
513 |
2781 |
5.4 |
22 |
252.8 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
595 |
2483 |
4.2 |
29 |
248.3 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
362 |
1547 |
4.3 |
16 |
154.7 |
| 5. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
416 |
1480 |
3.6 |
13 |
148.0 |
| 6. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
375 |
1468 |
3.9 |
20 |
104.9 |
| 7. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
370 |
867 |
2.3 |
10 |
72.2 |
| RUSHING DEFENSE |
G |
Att |
Yards |
Avg. |
TD |
Yards/G |
| 1. |
Angelo State |
11 |
395 |
1504 |
3.8 |
12 |
136.7 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
322 |
1411 |
4.4 |
16 |
141.1 |
| 3. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
400 |
1506 |
3.8 |
15 |
150.6 |
| 4. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
550 |
1834 |
3.3 |
26 |
152.8 |
| 5. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
386 |
1532 |
4.0 |
16 |
153.2 |
| 6. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
566 |
2221 |
3.9 |
19 |
158.6 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
414 |
1664 |
4.0 |
25 |
166.4 |
| PASS OFFENSE |
G |
Comp |
Att |
Int |
Pct. |
Yards |
Avg. |
TD |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
457 |
691 |
10 |
66.1 |
5544 |
8.0 |
57 |
396.0 |
| 2. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
267 |
449 |
12 |
59.5 |
3166 |
7.1 |
25 |
316.6 |
| 3. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
268 |
481 |
12 |
55.7 |
3634 |
7.6 |
35 |
302.8 |
| 4. |
Angelo State |
11 |
206 |
341 |
7 |
60.4 |
2256 |
6.6 |
19 |
205.1 |
| 5. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
169 |
328 |
17 |
51.5 |
1790 |
5.5 |
12 |
179.0 |
| 6. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
96 |
181 |
3 |
53.0 |
1599 |
8.8 |
12 |
159.9 |
| 7. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
112 |
198 |
5 |
56.6 |
1540 |
7.8 |
13 |
154.0 |
| PASS DEFENSE |
G |
Comp |
Att |
Int |
Pct. |
Yards |
Avg. |
TD |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
170 |
320 |
14 |
53.1 |
1885 |
5.9 |
15 |
188.5 |
| 2. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
196 |
323 |
10 |
60.7 |
2215 |
6.9 |
20 |
221.5 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
193 |
378 |
12 |
51.1 |
2229 |
5.9 |
19 |
222.9 |
| 4. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
268 |
475 |
14 |
56.4 |
3259 |
6.9 |
28 |
232.8 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
271 |
454 |
10 |
59.7 |
3063 |
6.7 |
23 |
255.2 |
| 6. |
Angelo State |
11 |
220 |
420 |
14 |
52.4 |
2891 |
6.9 |
29 |
262.8 |
| 7. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
232 |
379 |
8 |
61.2 |
2913 |
7.7 |
22 |
291.3 |
| PASS EFFICIENCY |
G |
Comp |
Att |
Int |
Pct. |
Yards |
TD |
Effic. |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
457 |
691 |
10 |
66.1 |
5544 |
57 |
157.9 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
96 |
181 |
3 |
53.0 |
1599 |
12 |
145.8 |
| 3. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
112 |
198 |
5 |
56.6 |
1540 |
13 |
138.5 |
| 4. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
268 |
481 |
12 |
55.7 |
3634 |
35 |
138.2 |
| 5. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
267 |
449 |
12 |
59.5 |
3166 |
25 |
131.7 |
| 6. |
Angelo State |
11 |
206 |
341 |
7 |
60.4 |
2256 |
19 |
130.3 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
169 |
328 |
17 |
51.5 |
1790 |
12 |
99.1 |
| PASS DEFENSE EFFIC. |
G |
Comp |
Att |
Int |
Pct. |
Yards |
TD |
Effic. |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
170 |
320 |
14 |
53.1 |
1885 |
15 |
109.3 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
193 |
378 |
12 |
51.1 |
2229 |
19 |
110.8 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
220 |
420 |
14 |
52.4 |
2891 |
29 |
126.3 |
| 4. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
268 |
475 |
14 |
56.4 |
3259 |
28 |
127.6 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
271 |
454 |
10 |
59.7 |
3063 |
23 |
128.7 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
196 |
323 |
10 |
60.7 |
2215 |
20 |
132.5 |
| 7. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
232 |
379 |
8 |
61.2 |
2913 |
22 |
140.7 |
| KICKOFF RETURNS |
G |
No. |
Yards |
TD |
Avg. |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
47 |
1334 |
3 |
28.4 |
| 2. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
47 |
1043 |
0 |
22.2 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
36 |
771 |
1 |
21.4 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
38 |
783 |
1 |
20.6 |
| 5. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
37 |
721 |
0 |
19.5 |
| 6. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
33 |
634 |
0 |
19.2 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
44 |
839 |
0 |
19.1 |
| PUNT RETURN AVG |
G |
No. |
Yards |
TD |
Avg. |
| 1. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
27 |
337 |
0 |
12.5 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
20 |
240 |
1 |
12.0 |
| 3. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
20 |
239 |
0 |
11.9 |
| 4. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
25 |
298 |
3 |
11.9 |
| 5. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
19 |
195 |
0 |
10.3 |
| 6. |
Angelo State |
11 |
26 |
134 |
0 |
5.2 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
12 |
20 |
0 |
1.7 |
| INTERCEPTIONS |
G |
No. |
Yards |
TD |
Avg. |
| 1. |
Angelo State |
11 |
14 |
179 |
3 |
12.8 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
14 |
218 |
0 |
15.6 |
| 3. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
14 |
59 |
0 |
4.2 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
12 |
138 |
1 |
11.5 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
10 |
182 |
4 |
18.2 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
10 |
138 |
2 |
13.8 |
| 7. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
8 |
69 |
1 |
8.6 |
| PUNTING |
G |
No. |
Yards |
Avg/P |
Ret. |
Avg. |
TB |
Net/P |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
49 |
2169 |
44.3 |
151 |
3.1 |
10 |
37.1 |
| 2. |
Angelo State |
11 |
66 |
2760 |
41.8 |
289 |
4.4 |
5 |
35.9 |
| 3. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
47 |
1884 |
40.1 |
183 |
3.9 |
4 |
34.5 |
| 4. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
44 |
1705 |
38.8 |
181 |
4.1 |
3 |
33.3 |
| 5. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
52 |
1888 |
36.3 |
152 |
2.9 |
1 |
33.0 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
74 |
2838 |
38.4 |
330 |
4.5 |
5 |
32.5 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
63 |
2326 |
36.9 |
308 |
4.9 |
6 |
30.1 |
| KICKOFF COVERAGE |
G |
No. |
Yards |
Avg. |
Return |
TB |
Net Avg. |
| 1. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
55 |
3263 |
59.3 |
817 |
10 |
39.9 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
118 |
7277 |
61.7 |
1515 |
45 |
39.3 |
| 3. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
61 |
3766 |
61.7 |
701 |
28 |
38.8 |
| 4. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
70 |
4336 |
61.9 |
1150 |
20 |
38.4 |
| 5. |
Angelo State |
11 |
62 |
3563 |
57.5 |
1106 |
5 |
37.6 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
75 |
3861 |
51.5 |
881 |
16 |
34.4 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
44 |
2438 |
55.4 |
780 |
9 |
32.6 |
| FIELD GOALS |
G |
Made-Att |
Pct. |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
24-30 |
.800 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
11-14 |
.786 |
| 3. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
12-16 |
.750 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
12-20 |
.600 |
| 5. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
8-14 |
.571 |
| 6. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
3-7 |
.429 |
| 7. |
Angelo State |
11 |
5-14 |
.357 |
| PAT KICKING |
G |
Made-Att |
Pct. |
| 1. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
52-52 |
1.000 |
|
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
28-28 |
1.000 |
| 3. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
77-78 |
.987 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
38-39 |
.974 |
| 5. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
49-51 |
.961 |
| 6. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
36-40 |
.900 |
| 7. |
Angelo State |
11 |
36-41 |
.878 |
| SACKS BY |
G |
No. |
Yards |
| 1. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
49 |
309 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
40 |
275 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
35 |
211 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
20 |
154 |
| 5. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
19 |
121 |
|
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
19 |
109 |
| 7. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
17 |
95 |
| SACKS AGAINST |
G |
No. |
Yards |
| 1. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
13 |
77 |
|
Midwestern State |
10 |
13 |
105 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
15 |
74 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
17 |
66 |
| 5. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
31 |
196 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
35 |
262 |
| 7. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
43 |
306 |
| FIRST DOWNS |
G |
Rush |
Pass |
Pen |
Total |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
87 |
254 |
26 |
367 |
26.2 |
| 2. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
86 |
146 |
18 |
250 |
25.0 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
119 |
113 |
15 |
247 |
22.5 |
| 4. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
58 |
143 |
33 |
234 |
19.5 |
| 5. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
133 |
65 |
30 |
228 |
22.8 |
| 6. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
118 |
74 |
20 |
212 |
21.2 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
87 |
86 |
21 |
194 |
19.4 |
| OPPONENT 1ST DOWNS |
G |
Rush |
Pass |
Pen |
Total |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
67 |
98 |
21 |
186 |
18.6 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
85 |
94 |
21 |
200 |
20.0 |
| 3. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
95 |
105 |
16 |
216 |
21.6 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
80 |
130 |
23 |
233 |
23.3 |
|
Angelo State |
11 |
82 |
118 |
33 |
233 |
21.2 |
| 6. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
113 |
143 |
23 |
279 |
23.2 |
| 7. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
120 |
139 |
58 |
317 |
22.6 |
| 3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS |
G |
Conv. |
Att. |
Pct. |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
96 |
195 |
49.2 |
| 2. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
71 |
163 |
43.6 |
| 3. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
60 |
138 |
43.5 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
61 |
155 |
39.4 |
| 5. |
Angelo State |
11 |
60 |
175 |
34.3 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
47 |
155 |
30.3 |
| 7. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
45 |
169 |
26.6 |
| OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT |
G |
Conv. |
Att. |
Pct. |
| 1. |
Angelo State |
11 |
53 |
163 |
32.5 |
| 2. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
50 |
140 |
35.7 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
55 |
150 |
36.7 |
| 4. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
54 |
142 |
38.0 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
84 |
220 |
38.2 |
| 6. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
85 |
216 |
39.4 |
| 7. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
68 |
161 |
42.2 |
| 4TH-DOWN CONVERSIONS |
G |
Conv. |
Att. |
Pct. |
| 1. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
15 |
22 |
68.2 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
12 |
21 |
57.1 |
| 3. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
5 |
10 |
50.0 |
| 4. |
Angelo State |
11 |
11 |
26 |
42.3 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
9 |
26 |
34.6 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
5 |
18 |
27.8 |
| 7. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
2 |
11 |
18.2 |
| OPP 4TH-DN CONVERT |
G |
Conv. |
Att. |
Pct. |
| 1. |
Angelo State |
11 |
5 |
19 |
26.3 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
8 |
22 |
36.4 |
| 3. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
6 |
15 |
40.0 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
9 |
20 |
45.0 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
15 |
33 |
45.5 |
| 6. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
10 |
21 |
47.6 |
| 7. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
12 |
25 |
48.0 |
| PENALTIES |
G |
No. |
Yards |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
75 |
594 |
59.4 |
| 2. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
72 |
604 |
60.4 |
| 3. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
76 |
688 |
68.8 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
83 |
732 |
73.2 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
106 |
940 |
78.3 |
| 6. |
Angelo State |
11 |
88 |
868 |
78.9 |
| 7. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
161 |
1358 |
97.0 |
| OPPONENT PENALTIES |
G |
No. |
Yards |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
115 |
1090 |
90.8 |
| 2. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
89 |
846 |
84.6 |
| 3. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
75 |
647 |
64.7 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
72 |
640 |
64.0 |
| 5. |
Angelo State |
11 |
77 |
663 |
60.3 |
| 6. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
107 |
840 |
60.0 |
| 7. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
56 |
470 |
47.0 |
| TIME OF POSSESSION |
G |
Poss. Time |
Avg/G |
| 1. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
332:44 |
33:16 |
| 2. |
Angelo State |
11 |
352:44 |
32:04 |
| 3. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
318:13 |
31:49 |
| 4. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
309:36 |
30:57 |
| 5. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
412:53 |
29:29 |
| 6. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
283:01 |
28:18 |
| 7. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
319:47 |
26:38 |
|
Gained |
Lost |
|
| TURNOVER MARGIN |
G |
Fumb |
Int |
Total |
Fumb |
Int |
Total |
Margin |
Per/G |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
13 |
14 |
27 |
7 |
5 |
12 |
+15 |
1.50 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
18 |
14 |
32 |
4 |
10 |
14 |
+18 |
1.29 |
| 3. |
Angelo State |
11 |
9 |
14 |
23 |
13 |
7 |
20 |
+3 |
0.27 |
| 4. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
20 |
3 |
23 |
+0 |
0.00 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
13 |
10 |
23 |
13 |
12 |
25 |
-2 |
-0.17 |
| 6. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
9 |
8 |
17 |
11 |
12 |
23 |
-6 |
-0.60 |
| 7. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
8 |
10 |
18 |
10 |
17 |
27 |
-9 |
-0.90 |
|
Red Zone |
Touchdowns |
Field Goals |
Lost possession |
| RED ZONE OFFENSE |
G |
Scores-Chances |
Pct. |
TDs |
Rush-Pass |
Made-Att |
Fumb |
Int. |
Downs |
Other |
| 1. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
43-47 |
91.5 |
37 |
28-9 |
6-8 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
72-80 |
90.0 |
56 |
17-39 |
16-20 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
32-40 |
80.0 |
30 |
23-7 |
2-5 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
| 4. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
39-49 |
79.6 |
28 |
13-15 |
11-16 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
| 5. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
37-49 |
75.5 |
25 |
10-15 |
12-16 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
| 6. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
21-32 |
65.6 |
17 |
9-8 |
4-6 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
| 7. |
Angelo State |
11 |
32-52 |
61.5 |
28 |
15-13 |
4-13 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
|
Red Zone |
Touchdowns |
Field Goals |
Lost possession |
| RED ZONE DEFENSE |
G |
Scores-Chances |
Pct. |
TDs |
Rush-Pass |
Made-Att |
Fumb |
Int. |
Downs |
Other |
| 1. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
23-33 |
69.7 |
19 |
10-9 |
4-7 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
| 2. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
39-55 |
70.9 |
34 |
14-20 |
5-9 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
| 3. |
Tarleton State |
10 |
33-43 |
76.7 |
26 |
14-12 |
7-12 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
| 4. |
Angelo State |
11 |
30-38 |
78.9 |
26 |
9-17 |
4-7 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
| 5. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
40-50 |
80.0 |
34 |
20-14 |
6-10 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
| 6. |
Midwestern State |
10 |
25-31 |
80.6 |
21 |
12-9 |
4-4 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
| 7. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
46-54 |
85.2 |
37 |
23-14 |
9-12 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
| ON-SIDE KICKS BY |
G |
On-side |
Pct. |
| 1. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
1-1 |
100.0 |
|
Midwestern State |
10 |
1-1 |
100.0 |
| 3. |
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
2-3 |
66.7 |
| 4. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
2-4 |
50.0 |
| 5. |
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
0-3 |
0.0 |
|
Tarleton State |
10 |
0-1 |
0.0 |
|
Angelo State |
11 |
0-0 |
0.0 |
| ON-SIDE KICKS AGAINST |
G |
On-side |
Pct. |
| 1. |
A&M-Commerce |
12 |
0-2 |
0.0 |
|
Texas A&M-Kingsville |
10 |
0-2 |
0.0 |
|
Midwestern State |
10 |
0-2 |
0.0 |
|
Tarleton State |
10 |
0-1 |
0.0 |
|
Eastern New Mexico |
10 |
0-0 |
0.0 |
|
Angelo State |
11 |
0-0 |
0.0 |
| 7. |
West Texas A&M |
14 |
1-3 |
33.3 |
| ATTENDANCE |
Home |
Avg |
|
Away |
Avg |
|
Neutral |
Avg |
|
Total attend |
Avg |
| A&M-Commerce |
5-21673 |
4335 |
|
5-33452 |
6690 |
|
2-10411 |
5206 |
|
12-65536 |
5461 |
| Angelo State |
5-28637 |
5727 |
|
5-23652 |
4730 |
|
1-16947 |
16947 |
|
11-69236 |
6294 |
| Eastern New Mexico |
4-8105 |
2026 |
|
5-21653 |
4331 |
|
1-8194 |
8194 |
|
10-37952 |
3795 |
| Midwestern State |
5-36311 |
7262 |
|
4-11557 |
2889 |
|
1-16947 |
16947 |
|
10-64815 |
6482 |
| Tarleton State |
4-20802 |
5200 |
|
4-20044 |
5011 |
|
2-22447 |
11224 |
|
10-63293 |
6329 |
| Texas A&M-Kingsville |
5-48069 |
9614 |
|
5-25655 |
5131 |
|
0-0 |
0 |
|
10-73724 |
7372 |
| West Texas A&M |
5-43834 |
8767 |
|
8-38841 |
4855 |
|
1-3093 |
3093 |
|
14-85768 |
6126 |
| Totals |
33-207431 |
6286 |
|
36-174854 |
4857 |
|
8-78039 |
9755 |
|
77-460324 |
5978 |
|
|